Are you Front Page News Again? Tips for Avoiding the Government News
Follies
By Kimberley K. Higgins, CPA
Scandals involving elected officials fill the local newspapers these days;
and while the stories are worth a good snicker, most governmental
entities are mortified to find themselves on the front pages,
or any pages of a newspaper. Greed and envy isn’t confined
to the ‘Enrons’ of the world, as some recent media
stories have illustrated:
A county pays a landscaper $1,000 per acre to cut derelict lawns when the commercial
cost is closer to one tenth the price. A city manager buys $300
pens, flowers from his wife’s florist shop and other luxury
leather items such as sheepskin covers for his city-owned SUV,
all at taxpayer expense, and enjoys a “booze-filled”
trip to Hawaii. He deems none of it “excessive” or
“significant” A city manager’s wife causes an
accident in a city-owned car while on personal business and has
the city pay for the damage. The city manager himself stays at
five star hotels when he attends conferences, dines lavishly and
outfits his city-owned truck at taxpayer expense – at a
time when the city is experiencing budget problems. The manager
prefers to use the city-owned truck for his private vacation and
hunting trips, which he fills up at city expense, despite owning
three private vehicles. An urban renewal authority’s board
racks up approximately $160,000 during a two year period for travel,
meals and training; dining at the most expensive restaurants in
Las Vegas, but noting in defense that it’s “expensive
to eat there.”
When the economy is tight, the public increasingly scrutinizes administrative
costs, compliance and processes for transparency. They want services,
not what is seen as government excesses. Despite the best processes
in place, mistakes happen, and failures occur. If your governmental
entity does become the subject of intense public and media scrutiny,
what can you do to control the damage, alleviate the situation
and defuse the problem; and then ensure there is no repetition?
What not to do is become defensive and excuse the unreasonable
behavior. Media frenzy quickly abates when the perpetrators publicly
apologize, and reimburse the entity for unreasonable expenses.
New oversight policies then need to be promptly adopted to avoid
becoming front page news again. When audit failures occur, proactive
processes in place help control damage and keep stories out of
the media. Here are some suggestions for policies and procedures
to shield your governmental entity from abusive practices that
could lead to media charges of mismanagement:
- Invest in competent outside auditors who ask tough questions
and look for excesses; and maintain good communication with
them. Auditors lend credibility to financial statements and
opine on processes out of place, or the lack thereof. For example,
how might school districts deal with money teachers collect
for school trips? What about the example of the school janitor
who empties the school’s vending machines and keeps the
money in his bank account for safekeeping? No fraud here, but
how will that play in the newspapers?
- Write a fraud and abuse policy to protect employees who want
to report excesses. An anonymous 800 number is one suggestion.
- Create strong internal governance and governing boards. Provide
training for board members so they can ask tough questions and
be effective stewards. It takes a long time to build trust,
but minutes to destroy.
- Put in place a good record retention policy. Staff need to
understand what policies are in place regarding retention of
documents, emails and voicemails. The HR manual should address
this. For example, what happens to voicemails, emails or sensitive
documents after three months? Policies should address these
issues so that everyone is clear.
- Form an audit committee with teeth strong enough to ask the
tough questions. They approve all the services of an external
auditor, meet regularly with the auditors, field accounting
complaints, and should be involved in the interview and selection
process of the outside auditor. Many members of an audit committee
feel they lack the skills to understand financial statements
and ask the tough questions. Bring in an outside financial professional
to help the board identify those financial questions and technical
accounting issues that can delay issuance of a clean financial
report.
- Put processes in place to ensure that appropriate management
and elected officials have examined and signed off on financial
statements.
- Ask for a management letter. Regard the letter as a form
of accountability: a ‘chat’ with a series of suggestions.
It is the auditor’s way of communicating with the Board
about weaknesses and potential trouble spots in the system.
Auditors will state the issues as they see them, but it’s
up to the Board to decide what to do. Auditors do have final
leverage, however, if they decide not to issue an unqualified
opinion. Normally, a management letter delivered to the Board
is not a public document, but theoretically can become public
and used as a press release.
- Notes in the financial statements are another way to give
and receive information and fulfill the need for disclosure.
How do we handle various policies and procedures? What makes
up the numbers? How safe are the entity’s investments?
For example, a loan fund gives the manager a loan to buy a house.
What are the details? What makes up the numbers? How safe are
your investments?
- Finally, ‘fess up to the problem when there has been
a failure. Nothing raises the public’s ire more than when
an official brushes off an allegedly egregious act as “justified,”
“not excessive” or “not significant.”
Reimbursing the entity for unreasonable expenditures, and a
public apology and statement that policies will henceforth be
put in place goes a long way to mollify the media and calm the
public. And then, actual execution of sound policies and procedures.
Financial accountability is similar to a three legged stool:
Governing Board oversight, competent Government staff and competent
outside attestation - all must be firmly in place or accountability
fails. By tightening internal controls, ensuring proactive processes
and policies are in place, hiring competent staff to provide the
information, organizing strong internal governance and governing
boards and training your board members, you can avoid your entity
becoming front page news.
KImberley
Higgins is a is a government and nonprofit partner at the
Denver Tech Center
office of Gordon, Hughes & Banks, LLP. He can be reached
at (303) 770-5700. This article appeared in the CGFOA's June
2006 Footnotes newsletter.
|